Corporate Social Responsibility

Promise 3: Operating as an International Corporation

Approach to Responsible Minerals Policy

Concerns are rising with regard to mineral resources, which are significant as raw materials used in IT and electronic components. In conflict-affected and high-risk areas including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and adjoining countries, the mining of such minerals may result in funds for groups that engage in conflicts and illegal acts such as the violation of human rights including forced labor and child labor, environmental destruction, and money laundering. Accordingly, the use of these minerals could promote the activities of such groups.

Based on our view that it is our social responsibility to take this issue into consideration, the EIZO Group aims at procuring minerals from sources with no involvement in conflicts or illegal acts (i.e., to procure conflict-free minerals) for use in our products.

To realize this goal, we conduct surveys on our entire supply chain and check the survey results to ensure that specific minerals (the four mineral resources (tantalum, tin, tungsten, and gold) defined as conflict minerals by the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act, and cobalt) are procured from sources that have no relation with illegal activities. If we discover that a source may have a relation with illegal activities, we will take corrective actions.

Furthermore, we participate in the Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI) and continuously support responsible minerals procurement from conflict-affected and high-risk areas.


The Due Diligence Process

We disclose our Responsible Minerals Policy on our website and demand that our entire supply chain makes effort to use only conflict-free materials in components for our products.

Furthermore, targeting our entire supply chain, we annually conduct a country of origin survey regarding the specific minerals using the RMI’s Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (CMRT) and Cobalt Reporting Template (CRT) to check if any minerals procurement may have a relation with illegal activities.

When the responses from the supply chain members include smelters that are not conformant with the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP) standards, we demand that the relevant member conducts a further detailed survey and/or an RMAP audit or consider procurement from other RMAP conformant smelters.


2019 Survey Results

In the conflict minerals survey, we collected more than 90% of the answers. This survey identified 319 smelters, and confirmed that 82% (264) of them were RMAP smelters. In addition, no information was found regarding involvement in illegal activities in mineral procurement.

In the cobalt survey, we collected more than 80% of the answers, even though this was the first survey using an official CRT. Through this survey, we obtained information on 61 smelters and confirmed that they include RMAP smelters. In addition, no information was found regarding involvement in illegal activities in mineral procurement. [Smelter List]



Future Activities

In 2020, we will continue to work on due diligence activities to further identify smelters and improve the rate of mineral procurement from RMAP smelters. Collaborating with our suppliers and industry organizations, we will continue to strive to realize our goal to use only conflict-free materials.